FairLab Pro · Tian-2
YauLab · 档位三 · 赛季能力多项目扩展YauLab · Tier three · Multi-project extension of Season depth

机构学校版School & Institution

学校几个项目一起管:逐个检查,问题汇到一张表上,交给负责老师,老师可以根据报告和各个学生进行统筹和反馈。
每一份报告交出去之前,都有教练人工复核过。一份合同管一年,学校报几个项目就管几个。
Multi-project team management: batch preflight, a coordinator view, and every audit capability run in batch across your roster — with human review included on every delivered report. One contract, one year, your whole portfolio.

¥29,800–69,800 年per year
为谁而设Who it's for

带十个项目的老师,缺一张能看全的表Whoever runs ten projects doesn't lack audits — they lack one desk to see them from

学校里带竞赛的老师,头疼的往往在另一处:十个、二十个项目,哪个卡在伦理文件,哪个查重时间有风险,哪个学生一次答辩都还没练过,没有一张表能同时看到。到了截止前两周,就只能到处救火。Science-competition coordinators at schools and institutions face a different problem: not whether one project gets a careful audit, but which of ten or twenty projects is stuck on ethics documents, which has a plagiarism-timing risk, which student has never practiced a defense — and without one desk showing every project's status, the last two weeks before the deadline turn into firefighting.

机构学校版把赛季版能做的事,铺到学校的整个项目名单上:每个项目单独查,按名单排队跑完整流程。负责老师拿到一张汇总表:每个项目走到哪一关、被什么卡住、有多要紧、谁负责、下一步做什么,一张表看全。AI 使用说明、致谢页、查重时间这些标准,全组按同一套来。The School & Institution tier turns every Season-tier capability into batch mode: a multi-project roster, a batch preflight queue, the full delivery flow looped across your project list, plus a coordinator's summary view — each project's current gate, blockers, severity, owner, and next action in one table. Policy standards (AI disclosure, acknowledgements, plagiarism timing) stay consistent across the whole group.

人工复核在这一档是包含的,不用另外加购:每份报告都要有教练看过、签上复核记录,才算交付。适合学校和带着多个项目的团队;只有一个项目,请看学生赛季版或提交预检版。And only at this tier is human review standard rather than an add-on: no delivered report may be marked complete until a human has filled in its review record. Built for schools, competition programs, and teams running multiple projects; for a single project, see the Student Season or Preflight Report tiers.

交付物Deliverables

赛季版能做的,每个项目都做一遍,再加一张汇总表Everything in Season × your roster, plus team management

每个项目都交齐三份:论文问题清单、材料核对表、整改时间表,HTML、PDF、DOCX 三种格式。哪些项目、排什么顺序、各到哪一步,都在给负责老师的汇总表里。Each project's full delivery includes the M1 / M2 / M3 set in three formats (HTML / PDF / DOCX); the roster, queue order, and summary views live in the coordinator deliverables.

三份清单(M1 / M2 / M3),每个项目一套M1 / M2 / M3 core set (per project, in batch)
  • 论文问题清单(M1):对结构、查逻辑和证据,问题标到章节、表号、行;挑出答辩容易被问倒的段落;结论只用 pass / revise / blocked,可能取消资格的用 ★ 标出;论文里的说法有没有证据撑着,也一并查M1 paper audit: structure check, logic and evidence issues pinned to chapter / table / line, explainability risks, pass / revise / blocked verdicts, ★ disqualification-level flags; includes claim–evidence matching
  • 材料核对表(M2):官方要求的材料逐项过(PDF 格式、致谢页、查重和做查重的时间、诚信声明、导师信息、AI 使用说明和聊天记录、伦理文件),按取消资格风险从重到轻排M2 submission gap report: item-by-item verdicts on the official materials list (format, acknowledgements, plagiarism and timing, integrity declaration, mentor forms, AI disclosure and chat logs, ethics documents), ranked by disqualification risk
  • 整改时间表(M3):什么问题、谁来补、最晚几号、怎么算补完;日期从提交截止往前倒推,复查在原表上更新M3 remediation and acceptance checklist: six-column table plus a D-0 countdown; re-audits update in place
项目名单、排队检查、给负责老师的汇总表Multi-project roster / batch queue / coordinator view
  • 名单和顺序:学校报了哪些项目、按什么顺序查、各自查到哪一步Roster and queue: which projects, in what order, and where each sits in the delivery flow
  • 汇总表:每个项目走到哪一关、被什么卡住、有多要紧、谁负责、下一步做什么Coordinator summary: each project's current gate, blockers, severity, owner, and next action
  • 标准统一:AI 使用说明、致谢页、查重时间,全组按同一套查Policy consistency: AI disclosure, acknowledgements, and plagiarism-timing standards unified across the group
九个关口的记录、数据代码核查、模拟答辩(每个项目都有)Nine-gate ledger + reproducibility audit + defense simulation (per project)
  • 每个项目从选题到答辩九个关口,进度各记各的;数据、代码、图表逐一查来路The nine-gate ledger tracks each project; reproducibility audits cover data / code / figure provenance
  • 模拟答辩分赛区、总决赛两种练法,按项目排期安排Defense simulation in regional / final modes, scheduled in batch per project
十四种专项支持,名单上的项目都可以约The full on-request menu O1–O14 (in batch)
  • 十二种都能按项目约:从 O1 论文整改工作表、O4 AI 使用情况登记表、O5 致谢页工作表,到答辩系列(O6 到 O9)、定位系列(O10 到 O12)All fourteen items available in batch across the roster: O1 remediation worksheet, O4 AI-use fact sheet, O5 acknowledgements worksheet, the O6–O9 defense series, the O10–O12 positioning series, O13 forwardable feedback, O14 parent-meeting outline
  • 此外包括,O13给学管老师的统筹记录 和 O14 家长沟通的提纲,帮助老师更好的完成工作O13 / O14 fit the school setting naturally: forwardable advisor feedback and parent-meeting outlines — constructive tone, no scare language, no award promises
服务方式How it runs

“几个项目一起查”是什么意思What "batch" actually means

这一档就是几个项目一起查(batch):一份合同管一年,学校名单上的项目挨个跑完整流程,该查一次的查一次,该反复查的反复查。名单、顺序和汇总表由我们统一维护。This tier runs as batch: multiple projects under one contract, looped across the roster over one year — each project gets the full delivery flow (equivalent to its own once / repeat), with the roster, queue order, and coordinator summary maintained centrally.

另外两档不一样:预检是查一次(once),查一遍、交一套报告、归档封存;赛季版是改一版查一版(repeat),一个项目查一个赛季。机构学校版等于把赛季版铺到学校全部项目上,再帮老师把总账管起来。For contrast: once is the Preflight tier — one run, one delivery, sealed archive; repeat is the Season tier — one project audited repeatedly across a season. The School & Institution tier spreads repeat across your whole portfolio and adds the management layer.

人工复核Human review

人工复核包含在内:没复核完,不交付Standard, not an add-on: no review, no delivery

三档里只有机构学校版把人工复核包含在内:每份报告交出去之前,必须有带过丘奖学生的教练看过,签上复核人、日期、结论、问题有没有改完。复核记录没填完,这份报告就不算交付。记录只能人来填,系统不代填。The School & Institution tier is the only tier where human review is standard: it is a mandatory step for every delivery. Until a human has completed the review record (reviewer, date, verdict, closure confirmation), that delivery may not be marked complete. Review records are written by humans only — never auto-filled.

能力对照Capability comparison

这一档有什么,和免费、其他档比This tier vs free and the other tiers

功能 / 服务Feature / service 免费Free自己动手Do it yourself 机构学校版School & Institution多项目批量Batch, all projects
规则讲解、论文模板、自查清单Rules, templates, self-check lists ✓ ✓
三份核心清单:论文问题、材料核对、整改时间表Core set: paper audit, gap report, action plan 不含 · 免费版为基础诊断Not included · Free is basic diagnosis ✓
规则逐条核对(注明出处,随官网更新)Rule-by-rule check, sourced and maintained 规则问答Rule Q&A ✓
选题撞车检查(393 篇往届获奖论文)Topic overlap vs 393 archive papers — ✓
研究计划设计检查Research-plan design audit 通用建议Generic guidance ✓
AI 使用说明、查重时间、聊天记录检查AI disclosure + plagiarism-timing check 参考资料Reference only ✓
数据、代码、图表来路核查Reproducibility audit (data / code / figures) 参考资料Reference only ✓
模拟答辩(分赛区 / 总决赛两种练法)Defense simulation (regional / final) 基础题型Basic prompts ✓
从选题到答辩九个关口的进度记录Nine-gate season ledger — ✓
十四项专项支持(答辩问题册、给老师的反馈等)On-request menu (14 items) 不含 · 免费版为基础诊断Not included · Free is basic diagnosis ✓
几个项目一起管、给负责老师的汇总表Multi-project roster + coordinator view — ✓
人工复核(每份报告有教练看过再交)Human review on every report — ✓

✓ 是我们来完成;
「自己跑」是工具免费给你、自己动手;
「加购」可选;
— 不提供。三档的完整对照在总览页。
✓ = we do it; “self-run” = free tools, your hands; add-on = optional paid; — = not offered. Full four-column comparison on the overview page.

怎么判断Fit check

该选与不该选When to choose it, and when not to

学校同时有几个丘奖项目,需要统一看进度、风险和逾期:这一档合适。负责老师希望每个项目单独查、又需要一张总表安排工作的;学校不想收集过多学生个人信息、愿意只用代号和非敏感字段推进管理的;明确要求每份报告交出前都有人工复核的,都合适。If your school runs several Yau projects at once and needs one view of progress, risk and overdue items, this is the tier. It fits coordinators who want each project checked on its own and still need one table to plan the week; schools that prefer to manage with student codes and non-sensitive fields only; and schools that require human review on every delivered report.

只有一个学生一个项目的,通常不该上机构学校版,赛季版或预检更合适;只是想让学生先用免费清单做基础自查的,也不用直接买;希望把学生姓名、生日、联系方式都交进系统统一管理的,这一档反而不合适,名册只收代号和非敏感字段。One student, one project? School is usually the wrong size — Season or Preflight fits better. Want students to start with the free checklists? Do that first, no purchase needed. And if the school hopes to hand over names, birth dates and contact details for central management, this tier won't take them — rosters hold codes and non-sensitive fields only.

不含什么What's not included

这一档没有的,先说在前面The honest list: what this tier does not have

还有两样,不论哪个档位、花多少钱,都不提供:替你写研究计划、摘要、论文或答辩 PPT,以及预测能不能获奖。And what no tier has at any price: ghostwritten research plans / abstracts / papers / defense slides, and award or advancement prediction. These are red lines, not locked premium features.

流程Process

四步,从来信到交付Four steps from first email to delivery

  1. 来信或者直接联系
    Write in
    学校的负责老师来信,说明单位、项目数量和学科分布;注明想了解“机构学校版”。The school / program coordinator writes in with the institution, project count, and subject spread, requesting "School."
  2. 资格确认Eligibility confirmation我们回信确认名额和合同范围(项目名单、材料保留和导出的约定),年度价格也在回信里定下来。We confirm availability, contract scope (roster, retention and export terms), and the annual price by email.
  3. 材料收取Materials intake建项目名单,给每个项目把九个关口的记录建起来,收各项目材料。材料只在本地处理,不会用于训练模型。We set up the roster and per-project gate baselines, and collect each project's materials. Processed locally only; never used to train models.
  4. 交付Delivery按名单逐个项目交付,每份报告都有教练复核过才交;汇总表随每批交付更新。Deliveries proceed down the queue, each report human-reviewed before release; the coordinator view updates with each batch.
规矩Ground rules

不代写、不预测获奖、和主办方没有关系、不贩卖焦虑。这四条规矩每一档都一样,全文在总览页。No ghostwriting, no award prediction, independent of the organizers, no fear-based selling — the same four rules in every tier; full text on the overview page.

FAQ

常见问题Frequently asked

买了机构学校版就能保证学生获奖或入围吗?Does the School & Institution tier guarantee awards or finalist spots for students?

不能。哪一档都不保证、不预测获奖或晋级。机构学校版交给学校的是每个项目的检查报告、进度汇总,每份都经教练人工复核;评审是组委会的事,和我们没有关系。No. No tier guarantees or predicts awards or advancement. The School & Institution tier delivers portfolio-wide evidence audits, status tracking, and human-reviewed reports; judging outcomes are decided by the committee and are unrelated to this product.

学生的论文和数据会被怎么处理?How are students' papers and data handled?

只在本地处理,只用来出各项目的报告;不会用于训练模型,也不会给任何人看。材料保留多久、怎么导出,都写进合同里。Processed locally only, solely to produce each project's deliveries; never used to train models, never shared. Retention and export terms are set in the contract.

学校老师能代学生咨询吗?Can a school teacher inquire on students' behalf?

能,机构学校版本来就是这么设计的:负责老师代表全组和我们对接。O13 反馈件和 O14 家长会提纲,就是给老师转发、开家长会用的。Yes — the School & Institution tier is designed for exactly this: the coordinator represents the whole group, and O13 forwardable feedback and O14 parent-meeting outlines are deliverables made for advisor and parent communication.

申请机构学校版(封闭内测)Request the School & Institution tier (closed beta)
现在发送邮件或者微信联系:18434232706。
想先看看报告长什么样:论文审计摘录(M1) · 提交预检版(M2)。这里提供了最简展示,实际参赛报告根据实际问题,一般是展示的多倍长度。

Email only for now. View redacted samples: coordinator view (School) · paper audit excerpt (M1).
contact@fairlabpro.com

在线登记,我们来联系你Register here and we’ll contact you

不想写邮件的话,填几项基本信息就行,我们会主动联系你。No email needed — a few basics and we’ll reach out to you.