FairLab Pro · Tian-2
STSLab Pro · 档位一STSLab Pro · Tier one

提交预检版Preflight Report

提交之前查一次:把你那套 STS 申请材料照 2027 官方要求逐项过一遍,交回三份报告和一张写清"几号之前补什么"的整改时间表。适合提交前最后把一道关。One delivery: your STS application materials run once against the official 2027 rules, producing three reports and one actionable remediation table. Built as the final external check before you submit.

¥3,999 单次per review
为谁而设Who it's for

报告写完了,但申请这一关不是只看报告The report is done — but the application is not judged on the report alone

你的 Research Report 已经写完或接近写完,申请截止临近。这时最容易出问题的往往不是研究本身,而是"研究之外"的硬性要求:资格事实是否成立、是不是独立个人研究、报告页数怎么算、申请回答是不是你自己写的、支持披露是否完整、受监管研究的审批文档在不在、三条推荐轨道走到哪一步、在线系统里还差哪些字段。这些事零零碎碎,申请人和家长自己查,很难查全。Your Research Report is finished or nearly so, and the deadline is closing in. What trips applications up at this stage is rarely the research itself — it's the hard requirements around it: whether the eligibility facts hold, whether the work is independent individual research, how the page limit is counted, whether the application answers are genuinely yours, whether support disclosure is complete, whether regulated-research documentation exists, how far each of the three recommendation tracks has moved, and which fields are still empty in the online system. Applicants and parents rarely catch all of it on their own.

预检做的就是这一件事:在正式提交之前,把整套申请,从研究报告、申请问答到披露情况、审批状态、推荐信进度,逐项照 2027 官方要求过一遍。每条结论都注明依据哪条官方规则,问题按轻重排好,最后合成一张表:谁、在哪天之前、补什么、怎么算补完。The preflight does exactly one thing: before you formally submit, it walks your whole application — Research Report, application answers, disclosure facts, approval status, recommendation status — item by item against the official 2027 rules, cites the official rule behind every verdict, ranks the gaps by compliance and acceptance risk, and merges them into one table of who fixes what, by when, and how "fixed" is verified.

适合首次申请 STS 的学生和家庭、没有机构支持自己带项目的申请人,以及想为学生要一份外部独立把关的老师。申请还在成形中、需要整个赛季反复审计的,请看学生赛季版;一次要管好几个申请人的学校,请看机构学校版。A good fit for first-time STS applicants and their families, students running projects without institutional support, and teachers who want one independent external check. If your application is still taking shape and needs repeated audits across the season, see the Student Season tier; if you manage several applicants at once, see the School & Institution tier.

该不该选Fit check

该不该选这一档Should you choose this tier?

报告写完或接近写完,申请问答也有自己的稿子,临近提交想把整套申请集中过一遍:这一档合适。首次申请、没有机构支持的,用它把材料结构和状态一次看清,也值得。This tier fits when the report is finished or close, the application answers have your own draft, and submission is near: one concentrated pass over the whole application. For a first-time applicant without institutional support, it’s also a solid way to see the full material structure once.

两种情况别买:还没有自己的稿子,内容审查开不了工,先用免费套件;已经预计要改好几轮,别把预检买成好几次,赛季版通常更划算。想要多轮提问(O2)或面试练习(O7)的,也在赛季版。Two cases where you shouldn’t buy it: the student has no draft yet (the content audit can’t start — use the free suite first), or you already expect several rounds of revision (don’t buy the preflight repeatedly; the Season tier is usually the better deal). Multi-round questioning (O2) and interview practice (O7) also live in the Season tier.

交付物Deliverables

三件套 + 五个按需工作表,三种格式Three core reports + five on-request worksheets, in three formats

每次交付必含 M1/M2/M3 三件套,缺一即未完成;三件均出 HTML / PDF / DOCX 三格式。Every delivery includes the M1/M2/M3 set — missing any one means the delivery is incomplete. All three ship in HTML, PDF, and DOCX.

M1 · 内容层审计报告M1 · Content-layer audit report
  • 有一个前提:得先有你自己写的初稿。没有稿子我们不开工,改为给一份问题清单和写作练习Precondition: a substantive applicant-authored draft must exist first; without one the audit does not start and you get a question list and a writing exercise instead
  • 论断-证据匹配定位到页 / 章 / 段:摘要里的结论,正文能不能撑得住Claim-to-evidence matching pinned to page / section / paragraph: can every conclusion in the summary actually be traced to this document
  • 方法与局限的可复述性、归属与独立性、引用可核实性、页数与格式风险Method and limitation legibility, attribution and independence, citation verifiability, page-limit and format risk
  • 5–8 条可解释性风险点(最难自证的段落);做得好的部分如实记录5–8 explainability risk points (the passages hardest to defend); strengths recorded honestly
  • 判定词只用 pass / revise / blocked;★ 标记合规级发现,陈述为事实,不作取消资格恐吓Verdicts limited to pass / revise / blocked; ★ marks a compliance-level finding, stated as fact, never as a disqualification threat
M2 · 材料层缺项报告M2 · Material-layer gap report
  • STS 2027 申请组件与时序逐项判定,共九项:资格、独立个人研究、Research Report 页数、申请回答自撰、支持披露、受监管研究审批、推荐轨道与成绩单状态、提交渠道与截止、赛后时间表Item-by-item verdicts on the nine STS 2027 application components and their timing: eligibility, independent individual research, Research Report page limit, applicant-written answers, support disclosure, regulated-research approval, recommendation and transcript status, submission channel and deadline, post-submission schedule
  • 每行注明依据的官方规则、现在的证据状态、该做什么;官方没写明的细节一律标"待核"并附官方链接,不靠往年或别的比赛去猜Each line names the official rule it rests on, the current evidence status, and the required action; anything beyond the hashed baseline is marked "to verify" with the official link, never inferred from an older cycle or another competition
M3 · 整改行动与验收清单M3 · Remediation actions and acceptance checklist
  • M1、M2 全部 must-fix 合并成一张六列执行表:问题(附证据位置)/ 应补内容 / 负责角色 / 最晚日期 / 验收标准 / 状态Every must-fix from M1 and M2 merged into one six-column table: issue (with evidence location) / what to supply / owner role / latest date / acceptance test / status
  • 负责人一列只用角色名(student / recommender / counselor / mentor / organizer),不写人名;倒排以申请截止为 D-0The owner column uses roles only (student / recommender / counselor / mentor / organizer), never a person's name; the countdown is anchored on the application deadline as D-0
按需菜单(本档限 O1 / O3 / O4 / O5 / O6)On-request menu (this tier: O1 / O3 / O4 / O5 / O6)
  • O1 Research Report 整改工作表:每条发现一行,含申请人作答列与修改规格列,不含替代文字O1 Research Report remediation worksheet: one row per finding, with an applicant-answer column and a change-specification column — no replacement prose
  • O3 资格与独立个人研究事实表,由申请人本人填写并确认O3 Eligibility and independent-research fact sheet, filled in and confirmed by the applicant
  • O4 受监管研究文档清单,含"活动开始前须就位"一列O4 Regulated-research documentation checklist with a required-before-activity column
  • O5 AI 使用与支持披露事实采集表(工具 / 环节 / 是否采用输出 / 是否本人复核 / 披露状态)O5 AI-use and support-disclosure fact sheet (tool / task / whether output was used / whether the applicant reviewed it / disclosure state)
  • O6 推荐与成绩单状态板,含 D-0 倒排,仅状态O6 Recommendation and transcript status board with the D-0 countdown, status only

O2(申请回答提问轮次)与 O7(Finalist 面试练习)不在本档:O2 需要跨多轮的申请人作答,单次交付覆盖不了;O7 需要官方 Finalist 通知,本档未包含该项服务。在本档提出这两项,我们会说明它属于哪一档,不悄悄打折扣。O2 (application-answer question rounds) and O7 (Finalist interview practice) are not in this tier: O2 needs several rounds of applicant answers that a single delivery cannot close, and O7 requires an official Finalist notice ; that service is not included in this tier. Requests at this tier get a pointer to the right tier instead.

次数说明How “once” works

"单次"到底是什么意思What "once" actually means

这一档买的是查一次:交付的就是针对这一版材料的一套报告。报告交付后归档封存;之后材料改了想再查一遍,就是新的一次,重新收费。This tier runs as once (single delivery): one run produces exactly one delivery — one report set for this one application. After delivery, the archive is sealed and treated as read-only; if you revise your materials and want another pass, that is a new delivery with a new folder, date, and fee.

对照另外两档:赛季版是改一版查一版,同一个申请整个赛季反复查,整改表在原表上更新;学校版是按名册批量,一个个申请人查过去。如果预计会改好几轮,赛季版通常比买好几次预检划算。For contrast: repeat is the Season tier's semantics — the same application audited again and again within the season, with M3 updated in place; batch is the School tier's — the full delivery flow run applicant by applicant down a roster. If you expect several revision rounds, the Season tier usually beats buying multiple preflights.

人工复核Human review

默认不含,可选加购Not included by default — available as an add-on

本档人工复核为可选加购。购买加购后,交付件先出"待人工复核"版,由人工审阅并在报告尾部填写复核块(复核人、复核日期、结论、修改闭环确认)后才算完成;未购加购时,交付摘要会如实注明"未含人工复核"。复核块只由人工填写,系统绝不代填。Human review is an optional add-on at this tier. With the add-on, deliverables first ship as "pending human review" and are only complete once a person fills in the reviewer block (reviewer, review date, conclusion, change-closure confirmation) at the end of the report. Without it, the delivery summary honestly states "no human review included." The reviewer block is filled by a person only — never auto-filled.

能力对照Capability comparison

这一档有什么,和免费、其他档比This tier vs free and the other tiers

功能 / 服务Feature / service 免费Free自己动手Do it yourself 提交预检版Preflight查一次One delivery
规则讲解、材料模板、自查技能Rules, templates, self-check skills✓✓
三份核心清单:内容问题、材料核对、整改时间表Core set: content audit, gap report, action plan自己跑Self-run✓
2027 规则逐条核对(注明出处,随官方更新)Rule-by-rule check, sourced and maintained参考文档Reference only✓
资格与受监管研究的分流核对Eligibility + regulated-research triage参考资料Reference only✓
AI 使用与支持披露检查AI and support-disclosure review参考资料Reference only✓
推荐信、成绩单交没交(只记状态,不看正文)Recommendation / transcript status (status only)参考资料Reference only✓
申请进度台账(九个关口的证据记录)Nine-gate evidence ledger—交付时快照Snapshot at delivery
Finalist 面试练习(官方通知后)Finalist interview practice (after official notice)参考资料Reference only—
七项按需支持(O1–O7)On-request menu (O1–O7)自己跑Self-run其中 5 项5 of 7 items
多申请人名册、批量检查、老师汇总表Multi-applicant roster + coordinator view——
人工复核(每份报告有人看过再交)Human review on every report—加购Add-on

✓ 是我们来完成;「自己跑」是工具免费给你、自己动手;「加购」可选;— 不提供。四档的完整对照在总览页。✓ = we do it; “self-run” = free tools, your hands; add-on = optional paid; — = not offered. Full comparison on the overview page.

不含什么What's not included

诚实清单:这一档没有的东西The honest list: what this tier does not have

以及不论哪个档位、花多少钱都不提供的:代写 essay / 申请回答 / Research Report / 引用 / 推荐信;Scholar、Finalist 或获奖预测。这两条是红线,不是加钱能解锁的功能。And what no tier has at any price: ghostwritten essays / application answers / Research Report text / citations / recommendations, and Scholar, Finalist, or award prediction. These are red lines, not locked premium features.

流程Process

四步,从来信到交付Four steps from first email to delivery

  1. 来信Write in邮件说明身份(申请人 / 家长 / 老师)、就读年级与所在地、研究领域与计划提交时间,注明申请"预检"。Email us who you are (applicant / parent / teacher), your grade and where you study, your field and planned submission date, requesting "Preflight."
  2. 资格确认Eligibility confirmation确认申请人本人主导撰写、符合 STS 资格、为独立个人研究,价格也在回信里确认。We confirm that the applicant writes their own materials, that STS eligibility holds, that the work is independent individual research, and confirm the final price by email.
  3. 材料收取Materials intake收取自撰稿件与九项材料证据。仅本地处理,不用于训练模型;推荐信与成绩单只收状态不收正文。We collect your own drafts and the nine material-layer evidence items. Processed locally only, never used to train models; for recommendations and the transcript we take status, never contents.
  4. 交付Delivery交付 M1 / M2 / M3 三件套与授权 O 项,HTML / PDF / DOCX 三格式,归档封存。You receive M1 / M2 / M3 plus authorized O items in HTML / PDF / DOCX; the archive is then sealed.
规矩Ground rules

不代写、不预测入选、推荐信只核状态、不替你确认事实、和主办方没有关系:五条规矩每一档都一样,全文在总览页。No ghostwriting, no selection prediction, recommendations tracked by status only, facts attested by the applicant, independent of the organizers — the same five rules in every tier; full text on the overview page.

FAQ

常见问题Frequently asked

买了预检就能保证入选 Scholar 或 Finalist 吗?Does buying a preflight guarantee Scholar or Finalist selection?

否。任何档位都不保证、不预测入选或获奖。预检交付的是缺项与风险的证据清单和整改行动表;评审由 Society for Science 决定,与本产品无关。No. No tier guarantees or predicts selection or awards. The preflight delivers an evidence-based list of gaps and risks plus a remediation table; judging is decided by Society for Science and is unrelated to this product.

你们能帮我改申请回答的措辞吗?Can you rewrite the wording of my application answers?

不能给"可直接粘贴的成稿"。官方规则要求申请回答由申请人自己撰写,生成式 AI 不得代写。我们的做法是:先摆出你的原文,再指出问题、提出疑问、写清要改成什么样,由你自己动手改。Not as paste-ready prose. The official rules require the applicant to write the answers, and generative AI may not write them. Our method: your original passage is shown unchanged, then the issue, the questions, and a change specification — you make the edit.

推荐信部分你们做什么?What do you do about the recommendations?

只跟踪三条轨道(Educator Recommendation、Project Recommendation、High School Report / 成绩单)的提交状态,并按截止时间给出提醒节点。我们不看正文、不代拟、不代改、不模拟,也不通过产品联系推荐人。推荐人的意见必须独立于我们。Only the submission status of the three tracks (Educator Recommendation, Project Recommendation, High School Report / transcript), plus reminder milestones against the deadline. We never read, draft, edit, or simulate the contents, and the product never contacts a recommender — their opinion must stay independent of us.

我的报告和材料会被怎么处理?How are my report and materials handled?

仅在本地处理,用于生成本次交付;不用于训练模型,不对外分享。交付件与台账不含姓名、出生日期、联系方式、学校地址、成绩单或推荐信内容。交付归档封存后目录视为只读。Processed locally only, solely to produce your delivery; never used to train models, never shared. Deliverables and the ledger carry no name, birth date, contact details, school address, transcript contents, or recommendation contents. After delivery, the sealed archive is treated as read-only.

提交预检版(内测)Request a preflight (beta)
现在只收邮件。想先看看报告长什么样:申请预检报告(M2) · 研究报告审计摘录(M1)。微信/电话:18434232706。Email only for now. View synthetic samples: application preflight report (M2) · Research Report audit excerpt (M1). WeChat/phone: 18434232706.
contact@fairlabpro.com

在线登记,我们来联系你Register here and we’ll contact you

不想写邮件的话,填几项基本信息就行,我们会主动联系你。No email needed — a few basics and we’ll reach out to you.