整个周期陪跑一支团队：Brief、Innovation Video 计划与团队网站可重复批注，九关证据台账持续跟踪，M3 行动表在原表上更新状态。已收到官方 Finalist 通知的团队，另开 Power Pitch 与 Q&A 练习。A full cycle accompanying one team: repeatable critique of the Brief, the Innovation Video plan, and the team website; continuous nine-gate ledger tracking; and an M3 action table updated in place. Teams that receive an official Finalist notice additionally unlock Power Pitch and Q&A practice.
Conrad 的 Innovation Stage 要的是三件：Innovation Brief、3–5 分钟演示模型的 Innovation Video，以及一个公开可访问的团队网站。三件必须讲同一个故事：Brief 里写不清的机制，视频演示不出来；视频里没有的进展，网站上就成了空话。单次交付能抓住某一时刻的缺口，但抓不住"改了 Brief 忘了改网站"这种跨材料漂移。The Innovation Stage asks for three artifacts: the Innovation Brief, a 3–5 minute Innovation Video demonstrating a model, and a publicly reachable team website. All three must tell the same story: a mechanism the Brief cannot explain is a mechanism the video cannot show, and progress absent from the video becomes an empty claim on the website. A single delivery catches the gaps of one moment — it cannot catch the drift of "we fixed the Brief and forgot the website".
赛季包做的是全周期跟踪：每次团队交增量就重跑一轮 M1/M2，M3 在原表上更新状态列，它同时就是验收记录；九关证据台账从 intake 一路跟到 power_pitch，把"谁承诺了什么、哪一关卡住了"留成可查的状态，而不是散在聊天记录里。The Season tier tracks the whole cycle: every incremental submission triggers another M1/M2 round, and M3 is updated in place on the same table — which doubles as the acceptance record. The nine-gate evidence ledger runs from intake to power_pitch, keeping "who promised what and which gate is stuck" as queryable state instead of scattered chat messages.
适合已经确定要走完整个周期的团队。只想在提交前做一次外部把关的，请看 Innovation Brief 批评；一所学校下有多支团队要统一管理的，请看机构学校版。A good fit for teams committed to the full cycle. If you only want one external check before submitting, see the Innovation Brief critique; if one school needs several teams managed together, see the School club tier.
每一轮交付都必含 M1/M2/M3 三件套，缺一即未完成；三件均出 HTML / PDF / DOCX 三格式。没有团队自写的草稿就没有 M1。这一条在任何轮次都不放宽。Every round includes the M1/M2/M3 set — missing any one means the round is incomplete. All three ship in HTML, PDF, and DOCX. No team-authored draft means no M1, and that never relaxes in any round.
O8 的硬边界：Power Pitch 练习仅对已出示官方 Finalist 通知的团队开放。未获通知的团队，任何档位、任何价格都不提供 O8，也不以"提前准备"名义变相开放。拒绝时我们说明这是本产品的服务阶段边界，不暗示入选与否。The hard boundary on O8: Power Pitch practice is open only to teams that present an official Finalist notice. Without one, no tier and no price schedules O8, and it is never opened under the guise of "preparing early". When we decline, we explain it as a product service-stage boundary and imply nothing about selection.
这一档是同一支团队，整个周期改一版、批一版：每轮重查一遍，行动表在原表上更新而不是另起新表。哪个问题哪一轮提出、哪一轮改完，翻这张表都能看到；历史轮次留档不删。This tier is one team, re-checked with every revision across the cycle: each round re-runs the checks, and the action table is updated in place rather than restarted — the same table shows which round raised an issue and which round closed it. Earlier rounds stay archived.
对照另外两档：Brief 批评是查一次交一套；社团版是几支团队逐队都查。赛季包覆盖的是一支团队，不能用于同校的第二支团队。For contrast: the Brief critique is one check, one report set; the School club checks several teams one by one. A Season package covers one team and cannot be reused for a second team at the same school.
本档人工复核为可选加购，加购后按轮次生效：交付件先出"待人工复核"版，由人工逐项审阅并在报告尾部填写复核记录（复核人、日期、结论、修改闭环确认）后才算完成；未购加购时，交付摘要会如实注明"未含人工复核"。复核记录只由人工填写，系统绝不代填。需要每份报告都必经人工复核的，见机构学校版。Human review is an optional add-on at this tier and applies per round: deliverables first ship as "pending human review" and are complete only once a human reviews them item by item and fills in the review record (reviewer, date, verdict, closure confirmation) at the end of the report. Without it, the delivery summary honestly states "no human review included." Review records are written by humans only — never auto-filled. If you need human review mandatory on every report, see the School club tier.
| 功能 / 服务Feature / service | 免费Free自己动手Do it yourself | 团队赛季包Season整周期可重复Repeat all cycle |
|---|---|---|
| 规则讲解、模板、团队自查清单Rules, templates, team self-check lists | ✓ | ✓ |
| 三份核心报告：Brief 逐问批注、要件缺项、整改行动表Core set: Brief critique, gap report, action table | 自己跑Self-run | ✓ |
| 规则逐条核对（注明出处，随官方更新）Rule-by-rule check, sourced and maintained | 参考文档Reference only | ✓ |
| IP / 公开披露风险标注IP and public-disclosure risk flags | 参考资料Reference only | ✓ |
| Innovation Video 计划与团队网站批注Innovation Video plan and website critique | 参考资料Reference only | ✓ |
| 从立项到答辩的九关进度台账Nine-gate progress ledger | — | ✓ |
| Power Pitch 与答辩练习（仅官方 Finalist）Power Pitch practice (official Finalists only) | 参考资料Reference only | ✓ |
| 八项专项支持（引用核验、时序倒排等）On-request menu (8 items) | 自己跑Self-run | ✓ |
| 几支团队一起管、给老师的汇总表Multi-team roster + coordinator view | — | — |
| 人工复核（每份报告有教练看过再交）Human review on every report | — | 加购Add-on |
✓ 是我们来完成；「自己跑」是工具免费给你们、自己动手；「加购」可选；— 不提供。三档的完整对照在总览页。✓ = we do it; “self-run” = free tools, your hands; add-on = optional paid; — = not offered. Full four-column comparison on the overview page.
该选它：材料会改多轮；Brief、视频、网站已经互相影响；希望有一张一直更新到赛季结束的行动表。Choose this tier when the materials will go through several rounds, the Brief, video and website have started pulling at each other, and you want one action table that keeps updating until the season ends.
三种情况别选它：只剩提交前最后一次检查、且只想看 Brief 的，第一档就够；学校同时带多支团队、要看跨队汇总的，这一档不够，看机构学校版；想让同校第二支队共用的，不能共用：一份合同只覆盖一支团队，机密创意必须按队隔离。Three cases where you shouldn’t: only one pre-submission check left and only the Brief to look at (the first tier is enough); a school running several teams that needs a cross-team summary (this tier won’t stretch — see the School Club tier); hoping a second team at the same school can share the contract (it can’t: one contract covers one team, and confidential concepts stay isolated per team).
以及不论哪个档位、花多少钱都不提供的：代写 Innovation Brief / 视频脚本 / 网站文案 / pitch 材料，替团队生成创意概念，以及 Finalist 入选或获奖预测。这两条是红线，不是待解锁的高级功能。And what no tier offers at any price: a ghostwritten Brief, video script, website copy, or pitch material; a concept generated for the team; and any Finalist or award prediction. These are red lines, not locked premium features.
不代写、不替团队想创意、不预测入选、不替团队断言事实、不贩卖焦虑。规矩每一档都一样，全文在总览页。No ghostwriting, no concept generation, no selection prediction, no asserting facts for the team, no fear-based selling — the same rules in every tier; full text on the overview page.
周期内改一版就能批一版，不按次数计。每轮多久返回意见，我们不写没实测过的天数：逐轮和你们约好，写进确认单。Every revision within the cycle can get another critique — there is no round count. As for how soon findings come back: we do not publish a day count we have not measured. It is agreed round by round and written into your confirmation sheet.
不能。Power Pitch 与 Q&A 练习仅对已出示官方 Finalist 通知的团队开放，这是本产品的服务阶段边界，与团队水平无关，也不代表我们对入选与否有任何判断。收到通知后告诉我们，练习即刻纳入本档。No. Power Pitch and Q&A practice is open only to teams presenting an official Finalist notice. This is this product’s service-stage boundary — it says nothing about a team's quality, and nothing about any judgment of ours on selection. Tell us when the notice arrives and practice is included immediately.
不能。赛季包的语义是"单一团队，当前周期"。多支团队请看机构学校版；这不只是计费问题：不同团队的机密创意内容必须按团队隔离，混用会破坏隔离。No. The Season tier's semantics are "one team, one cycle". For several teams see the School club tier. This is not only about billing: different teams' confidential concepts must stay isolated per team, and sharing one package would break that isolation.
官方要求全部提交元素为学生团队本人所作，教练可以指导但不能创作提交元素、也不能过度影响概念设计。我们不替任何一方做合规判定，但会在 O7 作者归属与支持记录表里，把"谁建议了什么、谁最终写的"如实分开记录，让边界对团队自己是清楚的。The rules require every submitted element to be the student team's own work: a coach may guide but may not create submitted elements or exert excessive influence on the concept. We adjudicate compliance for no one, but the O7 authorship and support-record table separates "who suggested what" from "who actually wrote it", so the boundary is visible to the team itself.
不想写邮件的话，填几项基本信息就行，我们会主动联系你。No email needed — a few basics and we’ll reach out to you.