一次交付：把团队自己写的 Innovation Brief 草稿与本周期提交要件过一遍，产出三份报告和一张可执行的整改行动表。适合提交前的最后一道外部把关。One delivery: the team's own Innovation Brief draft and this cycle's submission requirements, run through one pass, producing three reports and one actionable remediation table. Built as the final external check before you submit.
团队的 Innovation Brief 已经写完或接近写完，提交窗口临近。这时最容易出问题的往往不是想法本身，而是两类问题：一是内容层：问题规模的数字没有团队自己核实的来源、创新点的机制停在形容词、进度声明拿不出证据、成本假设当成已知事实；二是要件层：3–5 分钟视频没有演示模型、团队网站不可公开访问、引用打不开、成员变更时点说不清、IP 与公开披露从没做过决策。Your Innovation Brief is finished or nearly so and the window is closing. What trips teams up at this stage is rarely the idea. It is two other things: the content layer — a problem-scale number with no source the team verified itself, a mechanism described only in adjectives, a progress claim with no evidence behind it, cost assumptions treated as known facts; and the requirements layer — a 3–5 minute video that never demonstrates the model, a team website that is not publicly reachable, citations that will not open, an unclear membership-change timing, and an IP/disclosure decision nobody ever made.
Brief 批评档做的就是这一件事：在正式提交之前，把 Brief 逐问对照官方要求、把提交要件逐项对照规则断言过一遍，把每个缺口按参赛资格风险排序，并合并成一张"谁、在哪天之前、补什么、怎么算补完"的行动表。This tier does exactly one thing: before you formally submit, it walks the Brief question by question against the official requirements and the submission requirements item by item against the rule assertions, ranks every gap by eligibility risk, and merges everything into one table of who fixes what, by when, and how "fixed" is verified.
适合首次参赛的团队、没有机构支持自己带项目的团队，以及想为团队要一份外部独立把关的教练和学校老师。项目还在进行中、整个周期需要反复批注的，请看团队赛季包；一所学校下有多支团队的，请看机构学校版。A good fit for first-time teams, teams running without institutional support, and coaches or teachers who want one independent external check. If the project is still in progress and needs repeated critique across the cycle, see the Team season tier; if one school runs several teams, see the School club tier.
每次交付必含 M1/M2/M3 三件套，缺一即未完成；三件均出 HTML / PDF / DOCX 三格式。没有团队自写的草稿就没有 M1。那种情况下我们返回的是问题清单与团队动笔任务，不给可粘贴的范文。Every delivery includes the M1/M2/M3 set — missing any one means the delivery is incomplete. All three ship in HTML, PDF, and DOCX. No team-authored draft means no M1: in that case what comes back is a list of questions and writing tasks for the team, never paste-ready prose.
O4、O5、O7、O8 属于赛季包与社团版；这一档里需要的话，我们会告诉你它在哪一档。O4, O5, O7, and O8 belong to the Season and School club tiers; if you need one here, we will point you to the right tier.
这一档是单次交付：查一次，交一套报告，进度台账只出这一刻的快照。交付之后本次服务即告完成；材料改了想再查一遍，就是新的一次，新日期、新收费。This tier is one delivery: one check, one report set, one snapshot of the progress ledger. After delivery the order is closed; if you revise and want another pass, that is a new delivery with a new date and fee.
对照另外两档：赛季包是同一支团队整个周期改一版、批一版；社团版是几支团队逐队都查。预计会改好几轮的，赛季包通常比买好几次单次更划算。For contrast: the Season tier critiques the same team again with every revision across the cycle; the School club checks several teams one by one. If you expect several revision rounds, the Season tier usually beats buying single deliveries repeatedly.
本档人工复核为可选加购。购买加购后，交付件先出"待人工复核"版，由人工审阅并在报告尾部填写复核记录（复核人、日期、结论、修改闭环确认）后才算完成；未购加购时，交付摘要会如实注明"未含人工复核"。复核记录只由人工填写，系统绝不代填。Human review is an optional add-on at this tier. With the add-on, deliverables first ship as "pending human review" and are only complete once a human fills in the review record (reviewer, date, verdict, closure confirmation) at the end of the report. Without it, the delivery summary honestly states "no human review included." Review records are written by humans only — never auto-filled.
| 功能 / 服务Feature / service | 免费Free自己动手Do it yourself | Brief 批评Brief查一次One delivery |
|---|---|---|
| 规则讲解、模板、团队自查清单Rules, templates, team self-check lists | ✓ | ✓ |
| 三份核心报告：Brief 逐问批注、要件缺项、整改行动表Core set: Brief critique, gap report, action table | 自己跑Self-run | ✓ |
| 规则逐条核对（注明出处，随官方更新）Rule-by-rule check, sourced and maintained | 参考文档Reference only | ✓ |
| IP / 公开披露风险标注IP and public-disclosure risk flags | 参考资料Reference only | ✓ |
| Innovation Video 计划与团队网站批注Innovation Video plan and website critique | 参考资料Reference only | — |
| 从立项到答辩的九关进度台账Nine-gate progress ledger | — | 一次快照One snapshot |
| Power Pitch 与答辩练习（仅官方 Finalist）Power Pitch practice (official Finalists only) | 参考资料Reference only | — |
| 八项专项支持（引用核验、时序倒排等）On-request menu (8 items) | 自己跑Self-run | Brief 相关 4 项4 Brief items |
| 几支团队一起管、给老师的汇总表Multi-team roster + coordinator view | — | — |
| 人工复核（每份报告有教练看过再交）Human review on every report | — | 加购Add-on |
✓ 是我们来完成；「自己跑」是工具免费给你们、自己动手；「加购」可选；— 不提供。三档的完整对照在总览页。✓ = we do it; “self-run” = free tools, your hands; add-on = optional paid; — = not offered. Full four-column comparison on the overview page.
该选它：Brief 已经写完或接近写完，提交窗口临近，想要一道外部把关；或者首次参赛、没有机构支持，自己带项目。Choose this tier if the Brief is finished or nearly finished, the submission window is close, and you want one round of outside review — or if this is a first entry with no institution behind it.
三种情况别选它：还没有团队自写草稿的，别期待逐问批注，先让学生动笔；需要视频计划和团队网站一起批的，这一档不含，直接看赛季包；预计要改好几轮的，单次交付之后本次服务即告完成，再查是新的一次、新收费，赛季包通常更划算。Three cases where you shouldn’t: no team-written draft yet (don’t expect the critique — have the students write first); needing the video plan and team website reviewed too (not in this tier — go to the Season pack); expecting several rounds of revision (a single delivery closes when it ships, checking again is a new order at a new charge, and the Season pack is usually the better deal).
以及不论哪个档位、花多少钱都不提供的：代写 Innovation Brief / 视频脚本 / 网站文案 / pitch 材料，替团队生成创意概念，以及 Finalist 入选或获奖预测。这两条是红线，不是待解锁的高级功能。And what no tier offers at any price: a ghostwritten Brief, video script, website copy, or pitch material; a concept generated for the team; and any Finalist or award prediction. These are red lines, not locked premium features.
不代写、不替团队想创意、不预测入选、不替团队断言事实、不贩卖焦虑。规矩每一档都一样，全文在总览页。No ghostwriting, no concept generation, no selection prediction, no asserting facts for the team, no fear-based selling — the same rules in every tier; full text on the overview page.
我们不做这个判断，也不提供任何入选或获奖的概率、排名与暗示。本档交付的是缺项与风险的证据清单和整改行动表；评审结果由官方决定，与本产品无关。We make no such judgment and provide no probability, ranking, or hint about selection or awards. This tier delivers an evidence-based list of gaps and risks plus a remediation table; judging outcomes are decided by the organizer and are unrelated to this product.
不能。官方规则要求参赛概念是团队集体的原创成果、全部提交元素由学生本人完成，所以我们不生成概念、也不代写任何提交元素，任何档位、任何价格都不提供。团队先有自己的概念与草稿，我们才能开始批注。No. The rules require the idea to be the team's own original work and every submitted element to be student-made, so we neither generate concepts nor ghostwrite any submitted element — at no tier and no price. The team needs its own concept and draft before critique can begin.
仅在本地处理，用于生成本次交付；不用于训练模型、不作商业语料、不对外分享。团队的机密概念按团队目录隔离，绝不进入跨团队汇总件。交付归档封存后目录视为只读；保留或删除方式逐单和你们约定。Processed locally only, solely to produce your delivery; never used to train models, never used as commercial corpus, never shared. A team's confidential concept is isolated in that team's own directory and never enters a cross-team summary. After delivery the sealed archive is read-only, and retention or deletion is agreed with you per order.
可以。付款方与交付对象在报价确认单上分开填写：家长或学校可以是付款方，交付对象仍然是团队，报告与行动表也以团队代号署名。付款方不改变交付内容与红线。Yes. Payer and delivery target are separate fields on the quote-confirmation sheet: a parent or school may pay, the delivery target is still the team, and reports and action tables are addressed to the team code. Who pays changes neither the deliverables nor the red lines.
不想写邮件的话，填几项基本信息就行，我们会主动联系你。No email needed — a few basics and we’ll reach out to you.